03-06-2022, 05:32 AM
(This post was last modified: 03-06-2022, 05:49 AM by Graion Dilach.)
Right, this does only happen with VerrSza in EET. Because the PID talks use Is(True) as the trigger instead of the BranwenBG2-suggested IsGabber(Player1), EET_End doesn't detect that this trigger also needs a SoA/ToB chapter check and leaves it as-is which leads to the SoA PID ending up before all the ToB lovetalks. This also happens vice versa - during SoA, EET players have both SoA and ToB PID options already. Okay, I am an idiot on this one since weighting ensures that the SoA one gets evaulated first... sorry on that one.
JPme2187 you can upload your L#2VERRJ.dlg and I think we can do a quickfix on it (you can also try rewriting it on your own, this needs to be the final result, the state trigger needs to be changed from Is(True) to this GlobalLT("CHAPTER","GLOBAL",20) as you see here.
JPme2187 you can upload your L#2VERRJ.dlg and I think we can do a quickfix on it (you can also try rewriting it on your own, this needs to be the final result, the state trigger needs to be changed from Is(True) to this GlobalLT("CHAPTER","GLOBAL",20) as you see here.